5/7/2006
The Teres Bearing and wear.
After the platter upgrade in December, 2004, I spun vinyl regularly until
this day when I disassembled the Teres bearing to examine for signs of
wear. Below is what I've found.
1)
click on thumbnail to view full size image.
photo 1: After removing the platter from the bearing.
2) 
photo 2: After pulling the bearing out of the housing. Ball did not
come with the shaft. Tweezers were used to extract the ball. Then
the thrust pad was extracted using a small piece of foam tape and the
tweezers. The interior of the bearing housing was cleaned of excess lube
prior to the extraction to aid adhesion of the tape to the thrust pad.
Note that the lube in use was supplied by Teres. It appears to be a type
of automatic transmission fluid. Perhaps Marvel Air-Tool Oil...? Red
runny stuff.
3) 
photo 3) Thrust pad and Ball. Red arrows point to visible wear areas on
either part. Using a 0-1 inch Starrett No. 436 micrometer, I measured the
ball diameter away from the wear spot at .3748 inches. Measuring directly
over the wear spot the reading was .3723. That is .0025 inches of wear at
the thrust. Keeping in mind that this assembly, pad and ball, is
supporting a 27 lb platter spinning mainly at 33 -1/3rd rpm. Once in a
rare blue moon, a 45 rpm disc is spun.
4) 
photo 4: Close-up detail of the wear to the ball. As noted above, the
flat spot is worn .0025 inches. 180 degrees away from this flat spot is
another visual wear area but wear is much less apparent. My take on this
is that the large flat spot must have registered while thrusting against the
spinning bearing shaft and the smaller opposite end spun in the Delrin.
Evidence that the bearing shaft spins yet also slips against the brass ball and
the brass ball spins in the Delrin pad. Perhaps, if this wearing action were
allowed to increase, there might be something akin to lock-up with shaft and
ball; with only the ball spinning against the Delrin pad. What would be the sonic affects of that....?
5) 
photo 5: Close-up detail of the bearing shaft. Using the same
micrometer that was used to record its dimensions when new I have taken readings
again.
When new the bearing shaft showed .0007 inches of taper, top to bottom,
in its diameter measurement. The lower register read slightly smaller in
diameter than the upper register. The lower register read .7487 when
new. The upper register read .7495 inches in diameter when new. Now,
after 18 months of continuous use the readings are unchanged at the lower
register but the upper register reads.7492 to .7490 inches in diameter.
This is consistent with the visible wear pattern and indicates that the upper
portion of the bearing sees more wear than does the lower. This is normal for a
belt driven turntable.
It isn't practical at this time to record the bearing housing diameters
so the precise amount of wear to the bearing registers within the bronze housing
isn't known. When new I did manage to gage the diameters of this part
using an "air gage". At that time the bushing diameters recorded
were .7499 upper and .7497 lower. Giving a running clearance between shaft
and bushing walls at .0005 to .00025 inches. These are very tight
clearances yet the bearing turned freely. Now the running clearances will
have increased. We know this because the shaft measures .0003 to .0005
inches smaller in diameter at the upper register.
6)
Looking at the counter-bored pocket the bearing ball fits into.....and looking
at the machined face that takes the vertical thrust against the ball.
The brass ball was discarded in favor of a tungsten carbide ball, which
should have much better wear life and should also take the vertical thrust
without the possibility of deformation. Hopefully, it won't decide to
shatter into a million shards of...well, carbide. The bronze/delrin thrust
pad was retained and the bearing was re-assembled using Marvel Air Tool
oil as lubricant. The Teres owners guide was consulted for the assembly
procedure.
Summary and comments:
I should have taken the time to make a Rockwell hardness test on the SS
bearing shaft. This shaft is easily marked by the bronze bearing housing
during assembly / disassembly. (see photo #5) This indicates that the material likely
hasn't been hardened as part of the manufacturing process. More likely, SS
round bar is cnc turned directly into finish configuration and the fine surface
finish at the bearing registers is applied by hand, holding emery and or crokus
cloth against the shaft while the lathe chuck spins the part. That is what
finishes off the SS shaft. Then again, Teres doesn't charge very much for
this bearing assembly. At this time they only take $295.00 for a Teres
Bearing. Regular maintenance should help to preserve this bearing for many
years and, as long as the Teres guys are around, replacement bearings can be had.
On the negative, lack of maintenance could result in the need for a new
bearing every several years or so.
How about upgrading the process...? Apart from raising the cost, what if:
the shafts were cnc-turned leaving a
slight amount of excess material at the bearing registers....then the shafts ( in a
lot quantity) were sent offsite to a heat treater for hardening. Upon return from
the heat treater the shafts would have their bearing OD's ground on an OD
grinder to a very close tolerance, adding more precision and part-to-part
consistency to the very slight taper they install. Instead of seeing
between .0002 and .0005 inches of wall to wall running clearance we could
tighten that up a couple of tenths and see essentially the same running
clearance top and bottom.
Also, the bearing ball
pocket (in the shaft bottom) could use a bit more attention. How about a precision ground thrust
area, (hardened), to handle the vertical loading against the bearing
ball...! This should improve the wear life of the bearing. What
affect would this have on the sound....? Conjecture suggests that
ultra-hard, finely finished thrust pads above and below the hardened bearing
ball should result in lower drag and tend to chatter less. I'd think we'd
have a quieter running -- longer wearing bearing.